It’s a new soundtrack:

Candidates, Campaigns, and Playlists

Jean Clipperton, University of Chicago

Agenda

  • Role of campaigns and elected officials
  • Data on campaign music
  • Content of music: emotions and themes
  • Framework for analysis: PCA
  • Playlist stability over time
  • Conclusions

Background

Political campaigns provide an opportunity for candidates to provide information about themselves and the representatives they will become.


Campaigns provide

  • Opportunities to signal their qualities (delegate model (Mansbridge 2003, 2011))
  • Information about their ‘brand’ (gyroscopic model (Mansbridge 2003, 2011), ‘brandidate’ (Kaneva 2016, Harrison 2022))
  • Context for voters (both informed and uninformed) (Bonilla 2022, Roumanias 2005)

Theory: models of representatives

  • Delegate models center on the notion of a representative as an agent on behalf of their constituents
    • Collective-focused
    • ‘We’ over ‘I’
    • Principled: what is ‘right’ from an ethical or moral perspective
  • Brand model (Mansbridge’s gyroscopic model) is centered upon the representative as the commodity
    • Self-focused
    • ‘I’ over ‘we’
    • Determines what is ‘right’ from own perspective
    • Typically resolute

Context: Campaign music

Campaign songs used for hundreds of years to connect with voters and send messages about candidates (Schoening and Kasper 2011, Peterson 2018). Technology makes it easy to curate and share playlists.

Focus and expectations

  • Themes within the playlist music related to candidate archetypes, for example, themes of loyalty and specific personality characteristics.
  • Candidates’ playlists incorporate different emotions and characteristics, with a focus on trust

Theory

  • Different models of representation borne out in types of songs chosen:
    • Delegate models center on the notion of a representative as an agent on behalf of their constituents
      • ‘We’ over ‘I’
      • Morality-focused
  • Brand model (Mansbridge’s gyroscopic model) is centered upon the representative as the commodity {.fragment}
    • ‘I’ over ‘we’
    • ‘Signature’ elements, such as songs

Data

Data based on Trax on the Trail Database, focusing upon candidate-focused events (campaign launch, rally, stop, playlist, speech, town hall). Lyrics sourced from a combination of and .

  • Approximately 2000 songs for candidates with more than five songs on a playlist and more than five campaign-related events.
  • Approximiately 900 distinct songs represented
  • 19 unique campaigns in 2016, 2020, and 2024

Methods

Use of three primary methods:

  • Lexicon-based text analysis (NRC Emotion Lexicon and Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC)))
  • Topic Models (LDA (Latent Dirichlet allocation))
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of relevant terms

NRC Emotion Lexicon

  • The NRC emotion lexicon is a dictionary-based approach to text analysis.

  • Lists of words and their associated emotion

    • Example: ‘cheerful’ is coded as a joyful word while ‘idiotic’ is an angry word


NRC use

Songs have tallies for each emotion and these are aggregated by candidate in the analysis

Sentiment and emotions: NRC

Using the NRC emotion lexicon, I incorporate eight emotions:

  • Disgust
  • Anger
  • Fear
  • Sadness
  • Trust
  • Anticipation
  • Surprise
  • Joy

Sentiment and emotions: Overall

Sentiment and emotions: by candidate

Overall, candidates from both parties incorporate songs with ‘trust’ as the most common emotion.

Language and themes: LIWC

Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) incorporates measures of linguistic use, which I use for its indicators of the following:

  • Linguistic terms:
    • pronoun use, such as I, we, she/he, and they
  • Analytic language: use of logical language, including causal language
  • Social terminology:
    • including prosocial language, moral language, and conflict
    • gendered terms/social references: male vs female

Themes: social behavior



All candidates increased the use of songs with prosocial language over the elections with Democratic candidates employing more moral language in their song choices and Trump nearly doubling the ratio of prosocial language in playlists.

Topics: approach

  • Incorporated a topic model on the lyrics from all campaign songs.

  • Set topic numbers from 1 to 20 to find the best number of topics, incorporating two measures from CaoJuan2009 and Deveaud2014.

  • Latent Dirichlet Allocation model: model maps documents to fixed number of topics (five for this setup)

Topics

table output
Rank Energizing music Golden era Feel good celebration Love and happiness Empowerment anthems
1 shake time babi love girl
2 high life love day back
3 gotta gonna wanna peopl happi
4 babi heart night world make
5 tip back stop burn run
6 jump golden feel man work
7 power make danc give thing
8 low livin good make woo
9 bout long tonight start gon
10 song born music dream money
11 play home alright train bitch
12 home love walk woman hand
13 worri stand gonna higher rock
14 gonna freedom bodi live hold
15 thing light talk come feel

Topics



Trump has leaned toward more ‘feel good’-type music while Harris had empowerment anthems.

Principal Component Analysis (PCA): explanation

  • Principal Component Analysis offers a way to preserve the variation in the underlying data while reducing the number of variables present.

  • Variables are reduced through identifying relevant dimensions and collecting variables together.

  • Researchers name the dimensions thematically based on the variables present within the dimensional space

PCA: Candidate ‘spaces’



There are three distinct spaces:

  1. Linguistically focused (particular language and pronouns present)

  2. Emotional

  3. Analytical or logical language

Candidate ‘spaces’

Distinct landscape: Trump and Sanders and Years of Harris

Overlapping songs

Conclusions and future research

  • Campaign music relevant to candidates and key differences across parties and campaigns:
    • Pro-social language: all candidates increased, but particularly Trump
    • Moral language: reduction by Trump and increase by Democratic candidates
    • Generally more negative emotion by Democratic candidates but all candidates incorporated trust